Playing Video Games May Contribute To Keyhole Surgery Skills

Original Article - So. Robot surgery is here! Now the testing!!

Summary goes here!

Time for the hologram!

Texans and Their Tests

Original Article - Governer propose fund linking to test score

Why create anther test? ... the employer will have a easier time of finding out who to hire and in turn students will know zipping through our K12 system doesn't mean a dime and realize that the real world is out there.

Well. Standardized tests had been tied narrowly to mean multiple choice, which don’t have to, which can simply mean everyone take the same test, whatever form deem appropriate.

That said, I still think multiple choices can measure a lot of things with ease. Does 2+5=4*2-(2-1) measure anything? I think so. People keep talking about bad things about teaching to the test. But I consider that is OK if the test is well designed and I believe tests designed by professional will be better than the one I created for my classes — in the sense that taking all the statistics and level of details into consideration. Let along it will be more effecient than every instrutors create their own.

I understand that at a higher level, there are things that is difficult to measure. But, still, there are way to many instructors grade their students with tests.

Personally, I require my students to show all the steps how they reaches their answer. The purpose is to see at what level they don’t understand. So I can provide better advices. However, the test is NOT a teaching aid. It is time for them to show what they really know. I do use tests that require them to show steps. But the intention is so that I can deduct partial score based on how much they know. If I could design enough multiple choice questions that testing their knowledge level, I would not vote against it.

I think people are jumpping to conclusions here. Plan can be revised and progressive.

=============
People like to focus on standardized testing and my guess is that it is because it's a simple target. But why focus on that?

I don't think Gov. Perry will reject writing test. Didn't ACT and SAT all have them now? Taking one step further, we may be able to have computer simulated test, say, brain surgery via a simulated robot since the day of using surgery robot isn't that far away. I will say this counted as testing skill.

Why create anther test? Well. Just like you can't really count on the quality of our high school graduates. If all HS graduates are taking the test, the employer will have a easier time of finding out who to hire and in turn students will know zipping through our K12 system doesn't mean a dime and realize that the real world is out there. It is a way to motivate our students and have them take up more responsibilities. We can bring hay to the cow but you can't make them eat.

Can value and attitudes be measured? I guess you need first define what is a good attitude.

Since the final value is what employer is looking for, I think it's more realistic to measure the final product instead of the added value. Should employer pay for some of the cost? I think they should. But someone will have to devise the mechanism.

The Immigrant Factor

Original Article - Immigrant do better?

Summary goes here!

Immigrant has been a hot issues in last year's political debate. I think one thing people didn't think about is: What's are the qualities we really want from immigrants. The facial value is that we don't want anyone that do not follow the rules, which isn't totally wrong. However, just how many of us that never break a single rule - let's consider those earlier immigrants of the US.

The courage, the desire to find new life of some of today's immigrant is just the same as that of our earlier immigrants and this article demonstrate that.

To advance the education, in general, in the US, we need reward those efforts rather than punish those.

Personally, I don't, at the slightest, suprised that immigrant could do well in the US. To immigrant to US legally, foreigner will have to pass layers of challenges, let along the will of searching for good life. The will, however, could exist in some of the illegal immigrants too.

I don't see that immigrants are superior in any way. I think a big part of their drive is comming from the worse life they have had which in some way motivated them to work harder.

It's not likely we will put our kids back to those environment. However, a real success in education is be able to educate you kid in this environment.

Education plan works; it should be renewed

Original Article - few articles that hold the positive view of NCLB.

Summary goes here!

This echo my view of Jan. 8, 2007.

Nationwide, lotteries pay for far more than education

Original Article - Good general info on what lotteries money has been used for.

Summary goes here!

Lottery may seem to be a good thing in funding so many public need. However, it is also a social problem. People buying lottery ticket are expressing the un-happiness and the chances view of the life. The value of hardworking ethic is washed away and the willingness to pay for the social cost is low. If we think those projects funded by lottery is necessary, it could very well be come out of the regular budget.

Toward Integrative Learning

Original Article

Summary goes here!

There is a distiction between the hard-cored inter-field training and that of team work training. The team work training should be consided as K12 courses, while the research courses are not.

==== Scribbles ===
Inter-fields training is interesting and which is important and intrigering and can inspire ideas. This is like the afternoon tea parties. However, I always cauctious about team-work. A team work is good only if members are good. A team-work concept have been over-emphasised in US education and society to a point. At school, teacher are likely to assign teams without talk about what make a good team. Students are likely to be in a team based on friendships. Kids don't understand the concept that friendship don't have to be suffered just becaused they are not doing things togather. Some don't understand or care about the importance of the out come.

A team is work if people respect what they don't know. People exchange and query each other. Logical and open mind is needed. These training should be considered K12 training.

However, the teaching of repecting each other should be considered entrance level courses. This should not be confused with the hard-cored inter-field research courses.

Cracking Down on the Unaccredited

Original Article - Read the first 2 comments. Also the one on CA state law by Robert.

Summary goes here!

Yes. That's why we need objective accreditation. Time have changed, we need re-think about our higher education. What's our goal and what we try to achieve and what's the best use of resources. Of cause, in the end, only people truely interested in research will hold the higherest academic honor, be it a Ph.D. or else.

on The Report from Commission on the Future of Higher Education - working on

Another Front on Accreditation - Propose change in federal rules (2007/01/17)
Changing the Report, After the Vote
Regulatory Activism? - Inside Higher Ed
Carrying Out the Commission’s Ideas - Inside Higher Ed
Final draft -
Statement by American Council on Education President David Ward - ACE statement (2006/08/10)

• A short statement that given credit to the commission. An important movement to force the commision to continue improving problems in the report.

AAC&U Statement on Spellings Commission Draft Report - AACU comments (2006/08/10)

1. There are good points but sound self-serving from time to time.
2. The draft does seems to under state the importance of faculty and the efforts that's going on.
3. The draft may, like AACU stated, lower the importance of researches in institutions. On the other hand, research may be not in higher ed customer's mind! The report put more pressure on customer need - which explain why for-profit institution are on the rise! Institutions simply need recognize the customer need. Institutions can still have their agenda, but derive resources from different form. Institution will also need to find customers of their agenda - say, companies heavy on researches like IBM, Microsoft etc.
   

18 Yesses, 1 Major No - Insided Higher Ed (2006/08/11)

1. The article is well written. It shows a lot of inside actions of commisioners and it shows commisioners' true intension. With the tone of chairman Miller, I believe the intetion of the commision are well funded.
   
2. See the comment of Sheldon

Whodunit? Chairman Miller, That’s Who - Inside Higher Ed (2006/08/09)
- See comments by The Masked Poster
The Making of a Majority - Inside Higher Ed (2006/08/07)
A Near-Final Report? - Inside Higher Ed (2006/08/04)
Beyond Playing Defense
- Higher Ed. associations begin to embrasss the issues
Pell Proposal’s Price and Politics
The Spellings Plan
The Sounds of Conciliation
Will Anyone Listen?
Charles Miller Unshackled

Summary goes here!

A strange way to come up with report:
- list controvasial agenda
- stimulate discussion
- finalize it

Is this a good or bad way to proceed?

Rising costs make climb to higher education steeper

Original Article - very well written

Summary goes here!

This is a big problem and not many people have solutions.

For inistitution to continue raising the price, there must be enough demand for it. This demand are generated by the reality and the desire of parents in sending their kids to college. The reality is that: "College degree are minimum requirement for entry level job". Part of this reality is caused by the low quality of our K12 system. Suppose, we can improve the quality of our K12 system, it is very possible, the high school graduate can handle entry level jobs. If we can solve this, we have solve half the problem. But, of cause, you are going to questioning that isn't this will produce more qualified students for college and pushing the cost even higher? Indeed, it does produce more qualified students for college. But. As a country, we will only benifit from this.

The second part of the problem call for a different approach. We have to understand that, in the past, only





Let's think about this from several points of view.

1. Why can colleges continue to increase the price and without worrying about low enrollment? Isn't this what you expected if you raise the price out of propotion in the market?
The possible answer to this is that 1) the demand is so high, there simply not enough colleges to go around. 2) All institutions are raising prices and there are simply no choices.


In general, community college is the most affordable and, in recent years, we see students choose to start their college education from community college because of it's affordability. However, in general, we do see the increasing demand on bachalor degree which.

Defeat for For-Profit Model

Original Article - At this moment, it simply that the administration is yeild to the traditional faculty. There isn't any indication of the drawback of the for-profit model. Compare Edward Winslow's comments to those of Academic Professors.

Summary goes here!

The goal and plan of U of Illinois is thoughtful. A good starting point.

Have You Heard About "Tuitioning"?

Original Article - Propose state money to each kid and let competition take it course.

Summary goes here!

Competition is good. However, before that can happen, a quality check have to be set. Without quality checks, people will fall into traps. In this case, there can be cases that only sitter service is provided with low cost while nothing is taught to students. Family can simply claim day schooling while use the state reimbursement for other things.

Automatic Access or Raised Retention?

Original Article - UK try raise the admission standard

Summary goes here!

A question that have to be anwsered in the content of how to best use the resources to advance the society! The debate centered on raising the status of A university is not a good one.

A state have to set it's goal in the interested on the whole state and they have to answer questions like:
1. Do we need a advanced institution to keep our economic grow?
1.1 To what extend we like this institution to extend?
1.2 How much resources can we afford to support this institution?
:

2. What other kind of inistitutions we need in addition to the advanced research institution?
:

Three Cheers for High Tuition

Original Article - interesting point in that more scholar are needed in college because of the knowledge expansion.

Summary goes here!

Q: Who should paid for the knowledge?
At this point in time, open souce depend on people with job valoteer in posting the info. When other people learn about it, they could become even more knowledgable depend on that person's ability. That person may or may not share what he had learn. Even though, the more people that knows, the more likely the knowledge been passed down in cheaper price. Do we have to be a professor to process those knowledge? Maybe not! People in the related industry can do so. However, do we need some public funded professors so that public can ensure knowledge get passed down?

The Incredibles

Original Article

Summary goes here!

The bottom line - most US K12 isn't doing it's job.
The work ethic do all the talkings.
I don't expect all the kids doing that. But I do think a lot of other kids can do much better.
These kids are incredible. But on the other hand, with the advance in living condition and the resources, they SHOULD doing better than our generation and this is what US should shooting for when we still have the advantage of left wealth. This is how we keep ahead and not to afraid of the competition from the abroad.

on No Child Left Behind

How Bush education law has changed our schools
Bush left too many good education ideas behind
Report card mixed on education law

Summary goes here!

It is un-questionable that the law definitly changed the US K12 education. It brought needed attention to the topic and make it a hot debate item and that is great!

It is all agreed that test scores have gone up. People can question that if the test score measuring the real learning, but there is no doubt that given the goal, the law does effectively moving the education toward that goal. So, in theory, by refining the goal, the law will, in general, move US K12 education toward that better goal.

It is true that if we focus in certain goals, some other thing will be lost. But we also have to realize that that is the norm since everyone has only 24 hours a day. We simply have to make sure the goal we set is appropriate in that it is definitly the needed basic. I am not saying that poetry is not good, but that definitly is not a surviving need.

The law had put a lot of pressure on schools and teachers which isn't a really bad thing. At least it reminded schools of their responsibilities. However, we do need realize that, parents and students should do their parts too. A big question is to establish the right balances between that duty of parents/students and that of the schools.

Seeking the right balances is very important as we all know the learning did not stop at school. The NCLB may be able to force the high scores, but it has no guaranty of suitable contribution to the society. To really produce a responsible citizen of the future, we need make responsibility training the main part of the education. This can only be achieved by making sure parents and students taking up their responsibilities right from the begining.

Schools and teachers are responsible to provide needed help to students/parents, but students and parents are responsible in making progresses. A pure state funded tutoring is a bad idea. A state compensated tutoring is a better idea. Parents/students have to be made to evaluate the situation and decided on if they can achive the progress with minimum cost. People have to understand that charity is due only if they do their part.

Seeking a New Skills Revolution

Original Article - Check the comments
Executive Summary for Tough Choices or Tough Times
- First empression: Accountability is all over the places. The proposed changes are enomarous and may not be practicle. What good it is if no one is going to adopt it. I don't know if it's realistic. It propose a mass production of high quality worker while detail less on how those works will be created. Is it realistic to assum that US will house all the high quality job while others will not? It does not consider if US are too late in the game. We have to realize that if we are too late in the game, the only choice we will have is to hope to achieve a sustainable society other than a elite society.

Summary goes here!

US should 'focus its economy on high end products and services'. Which is the right approach. The question is how. Everyone will say: through education. The problem is, this is no small job.



Without making students take up responsibilities, any system will fail. Public funding schools does not mean everyone entitle to go to school - just like not everyone got to be governnor. Yes, not all students are for college, but we still need provide them appropriate future.

State Spending Continues to Climb

Original Article

Summary goes here!

Let's see if any of these exceed the inflation rate? The state pending cap?

Tuition Tax Break Extended

Original Article

Summary goes here! - still working on...

This way of please voter have been carried out for quite a while.
I, however, wonder if this solve the real problem and if this is the right policy. Or if this should be part of a bigger picture.

A demoncartic system requires people take their own responsibilities and using public resources to help those un-fortunate. Governments can't afford to let people slip away from their responsibilities. One way to prompt people to take their responsibility is through compansation. In this view, this seem to be a reasonable approach. The Tax Break won't cover all cost, so people have to value the education enough to spend their own money.

Like some of the comments said, how about those can't afford to go to colleges? Do we consider them the un-fortunate? Or if it's fare for parent that making more money be 'required' to pay their kids' college cost? Should we simply send qualified kids at no cost?

Feeling the Winds From Washington

Original Article - Again, the comments there are of no construction.

Summary goes here!

As acknowleged by some academics, there are problems. A question should also asked is how we build a system that will reduce the chances for these problems to happen. As we all know, self monitoring is problematic in human history.

As one also point out that the Spellings give them more chances in examing their systems.

Endless debates on fair admission

Original Article

Drafts to be re-written

Idea:
Everone have equal chances
--Library
--Internet Chat
Test is not coachable
--Study more and hard should not be considered coachable.
--Test need be written so that it test the 'real knowledge'.
Admission is based purly on score


Q:

1. Will diversity still a questions if the above goal is obtained?
2. Message: The door is open to any race, as long as you can excel the test. This is open to all.

Suppose, no race info is given at admission, there will then be no question about race(name is another clue). Institution will then be race blind. The question is then on how to achieve the equal chances for all kids. K12 does not cost a dime that is a ground. Library is free, that is race blind. Teacher speak to all kids that is race blind. The GPA may be race biased. So use standard test - which is race blind. Parent help - teacher should do better so that parent help doesn't help.
Assuming all parent do is watching but not teaching or at least wouldn't help in grade.

Diversity operation is against fairness! They simply can't be co-exist in principle. Even in a pure race blind environment, there are other factors that will randered the un-diversity. The insist on diversity is simply another non-blind, biased factor.

Do we favor the diversity or the fairness?
Fairness brings in diversity in nature process while the diversity brings in fairness in artifacture.

The Need for Another Sputnik

Original Article - Problem in science education - lake motivation

Summary goes here!

‘To get a good job after graduation: 64 percent’ — Well. Do our college courses designed for this? — It doesn’t mean it’s a good thing, but we do need understand students’ need in order to communicate with them.

‘They think it is too difficult: 44 percent’ — Well. Indeed it is and which is not going to change. It seems this is a social problem. Our kids just don’t like hard work. How to solve this?

I used to hear a saying that “China’s leader are engineers while US’ leader are politicians” — No. I don’t think it’s always true. But this give us something to think about. Were scientists in US given more respects or spotlights than politicians or pop star?

I read a story about a high-achieving engineer who decided to go back to school and earn a MBA degree because his counterparts made more money than he did’.

Well. If science is going to be hard and low rewarding, I don’t think many people are motivated to learn it. We can make it mandatory but that will only achieve the facial value?

I wonder if in our society, there is a mind set that scientists are ONLY good at science and that they make no good management decisions. The thing is that if scientists were able to comprehend the hard stuff, why we think they will have trouble understand management? Sometimes, chances is all it take to give people motivated. On the ohter hand, without good tech. background, how a general manager can make good tech. decisions?

By the way, Intel used to be led by CEOs with tech. background.

Consensus (or Not) About Comparability

Original Article - On Spellings' accreditation meeting

Summary goes here!

This is a big task and I still feel that establishing a new accreditation type for for-profit institutions is a good start. For one, for-profit institutions is the one that is likely to run out of control and if there isn't any mechanism to objectively rectify these institutions there will be a lot of diploma mill. On the other hand, these new accreditation type can drive the cost down due to the competetion. Given time, these institution will grow and will push some traditional institutions to adjust their operation. Some of them may choose to run like for-profit and some of them may opt to offer qualities that can't be offered by low cost for-profit institutions - like research oriented trainings.

First on the Docket: Accreditation

Original Article - Accreditaion may be the first step taken by US DOE on hihger ed.

Let's give public alternatives by accrediting for-profit with objective measurements.

In light of the recent public call for accountability and the hardship for traditional institution to adopt changes. An alternative is to give public choices and let the public decide.

The alternative accreditation can based on measurable outcomes and since the outcome is what employer care about, students came out of these accreditaion can have direct employ perspectives. And this could potentially be the expectation of a lot of students and parents. The two pieces of information required from these institutions will be the % of graduates that pass the professional test and the percent of students that graduates.

The idea behind these two measurements are:

1. It gives students and parents an expectable value - % of graduates that can pass the professional test and, therefore, an expected job offering.
2. It hold the students responsible to be able to fall inside the % of students who do graduate.

It is important to realized that what we really should be interested in is the quality of the graduates and is not the quantity of the graduates. The % of students graduate serves the purpose of infoming students and parents the possiblity they will graduate. As point out by Dr. Abdul-Rahim Ahmad, commenting the article 'RateMyProfessors: Hidden Camera Edition', the majority of the reponsibility of graduating is in the hand of the students. The quality of institution is warranted by the % that passing the certificates, it is student's responsibility to advanced into the group that will graduate.

The certificate exam may have different levels, for BS and BA certificates, it can includes items that measuring the general education.

With this approach, traditional institutions have no reason to object. For one, it does not affect their status and practice. For two, it is also them that call for strick regulation on for-profit instituttions. For for-profit institutions, they got alternatives to the traditional accreditation approaches. They can decide on which way is a best fit to their mission. For policy makers, they answered to public's call for quality and effectiveness by leveling the playground and let the most effective and the most effecient institutions win.

Making Sense of ‘Bologna Degrees’

Original Article

Summary goes here!

I thought there were a lot of opposition against assess US higher ed. But it seems, after all, people here agree that content is much more important then the formality of year. Or maybe we should extend this a bit to the formality of our bachelor title - I do agree with Claude Pressnell's concern that their 3 year may not be uniform either.

But the key here is the competency of the students. How can we best measure it? Or, just let them in and see how long it take them to graduate - which can be a waste of resources but it can still be fair.

About the general education - America need really think about this! I would say things that deem necessary to become a responsible citizen should be mandate in K12. We also should realize that even if you have committed to a major, you can still enrol in other class for the sake of broaden your content. Graduate school can still require it if it is essntial to meet their quality of graduation.